Tomorrow’s Football BTTS Predictions

Tips for tomorrow October 3, 2025 Shows outcome probability of each result ( ) Displays the average odds for the bet
Iran
Persepolis Tehran
Gol Gohar Sirjan
NG
NG
61%
(1.5)
GG
39%
(2.37)
Bulgaria
CSKA Sofia II
Sportist Svoge
NG
NG
61%
(1.65)
GG
40%
(2.07)
Tunisia
US Monastir
JS El Omrane
NG
NG
60%
(1.49)
GG
40%
(2.43)
Tunisia
Stade Tunisien Tunis
ES Zarzis
NG
NG
60%
(1.47)
GG
40%
(2.48)
Tunisia
AS Gabes
Club Africain Tunis
NG
NG
60%
(1.44)
GG
41%
(2.56)
Egypt
Smouha SC
Ismaily Ismailiya
NG
NG
59%
(1.47)
GG
41%
(2.49)
Latvia
Riga FC
FK Liepaja
NG
NG
59%
(1.72)
GG
41%
(1.98)
Ukraine
Kolos Kovalivka
Rukh Lviv
NG
NG
59%
(1.51)
GG
41%
(2.38)
Spain
Real Murcia
Sevilla Atletico
NG
NG
59%
(1.6)
GG
41%
(2.19)
Morocco
Raja Casablanca
MAS Fez
NG
NG
59%
(1.52)
GG
42%
(2.36)
Northern Ireland
Linfield
Crusaders
NG
NG
59%
(1.7)
GG
42%
(2.01)
Iran
Aluminium Arak
Shams Azar Qazvin
NG
NG
58%
(1.55)
GG
42%
(2.28)
Georgia
Gagra
Iberia 1999 Tbilisi
NG
NG
58%
(1.64)
GG
42%
(2.14)
Morocco
CODM Meknes
Wydad Casablanca
NG
NG
58%
(1.56)
GG
42%
(2.26)
Tunisia
AS Soliman
CA Bizertin Bizerte
NG
NG
58%
(1.58)
GG
42%
(2.2)
Uzbekistan
AGMK Olmaliq
Kokand 1912
NG
NG
58%
(1.72)
GG
43%
(2)
Brazil
Vila Nova GO
Criciuma SC
NG
NG
57%
(1.61)
GG
43%
(2.19)
Argentina
Tigre Victoria
Defensa Y Justicia
NG
NG
57%
(1.66)
GG
43%
(2.13)
Azerbaijan
Zira Baku
Neftchi Baku
NG
NG
57%
(1.69)
GG
43%
(2.03)
Brazil
Athletic Club MG
Amazonas AM
NG
NG
57%
(1.65)
GG
44%
(2.13)
Egypt
National Bank SC
Al Masry Port Said
NG
NG
56%
(1.86)
GG
44%
(1.85)
Switzerland
Stade Nyonnais
Wil
GG
NG
44%
(2.22)
GG
56%
(1.57)
Algeria
Paradou AC
JS Kabylie
NG
NG
56%
(1.66)
GG
44%
(2.06)
Netherlands
TOP Oss
Jong PSV
GG
NG
44%
(2.73)
GG
56%
(1.41)
Switzerland
Aarau
Yverdon-Sport
GG
NG
44%
(2.2)
GG
56%
(1.58)
Denmark
Odense
Sonderjyske
GG
NG
44%
(2.33)
GG
56%
(1.54)
Egypt
Al Ittihad Alexandria
Al Mokawloon Al Arab
NG
NG
56%
(1.45)
GG
44%
(2.52)
Switzerland
Neuchatel Xamax
Lausanne-Ouchy
GG
NG
44%
(2.6)
GG
56%
(1.43)
Netherlands
MVV Maastricht
FC Eindhoven
GG
NG
44%
(2.43)
GG
56%
(1.5)
Netherlands
FC Den Bosch
RKC Waalwijk
GG
NG
44%
(2.52)
GG
56%
(1.47)
Germany
Duisburg
Hansa Rostock
GG
NG
44%
(2.16)
GG
56%
(1.61)
Sweden
Ariana
Lunds
GG
NG
45%
(2.06)
GG
56%
(1.68)
Netherlands
Willem II Tilburg
Roda JC Kerkrade
GG
NG
45%
(2.36)
GG
55%
(1.53)
Germany
Hoffenheim
FC Koln
GG
NG
45%
(2.49)
GG
55%
(1.48)
Czech Republic
Usti nad Labem
Zbrojovka Brno
GG
NG
45%
(2.17)
GG
55%
(1.61)
Netherlands
FC Dordrecht
VVV-Venlo
GG
NG
45%
(2.62)
GG
55%
(1.44)
Netherlands
Vitesse Arnhem
Jong FC Utrecht
GG
NG
45%
(2.43)
GG
55%
(1.51)
Netherlands
Helmond Sport
Almere City FC
GG
NG
45%
(2.35)
GG
55%
(1.54)
Netherlands
Jong AZ
ADO Den Haag
GG
NG
45%
(2.52)
GG
55%
(1.47)
Austria
SKU Amstetten
Liefering
GG
NG
46%
(2.06)
GG
54%
(1.68)
Austria
SV Stripfing
Admira Wacker Modling
GG
NG
46%
(2.02)
GG
54%
(1.71)
Netherlands
Jong Ajax
De Graafschap
GG
NG
46%
(3.08)
GG
54%
(1.33)
Netherlands
SC Cambuur
FC Emmen
GG
NG
46%
(2.2)
GG
54%
(1.61)
Czech Republic
Dynamo Ceske Budejovice
Pribram
GG
NG
47%
(2.1)
GG
54%
(1.65)
Thailand
Lamphun Warriors
Muangthong United
GG
NG
47%
(2.16)
GG
54%
(1.6)
England
Bournemouth
Fulham
GG
NG
47%
(2)
GG
53%
(1.75)
Turkey
Boluspor
Esenler Erokspor
GG
NG
47%
(2.2)
GG
53%
(1.58)
Germany
Fortuna Dusseldorf
Nurnberg
GG
NG
47%
(2.39)
GG
53%
(1.52)
Belgium
KAA Gent
Charleroi
GG
NG
47%
(2.31)
GG
53%
(1.56)
Ireland
Athlone Town
Dundalk
GG
NG
48%
(1.87)
GG
53%
(1.81)
Poland
Stal Mielec
Chrobry Glogow
GG
NG
48%
(2.19)
GG
53%
(1.6)
Austria
First Vienna FC 1894
Floridsdorfer AC
GG
NG
48%
(1.88)
GG
53%
(1.82)
Wales
Briton Ferry Llansawel
Pen-y-Bont FC
GG
NG
48%
(2.06)
GG
52%
(1.67)
Netherlands
NAC Breda
FC Groningen
GG
NG
48%
(2.01)
GG
52%
(1.74)
Germany
Eintracht Braunschweig
Paderborn
GG
NG
48%
(2.29)
GG
52%
(1.56)
Poland
Pogon Szczecin
Piast Gliwice
GG
NG
48%
(2.09)
GG
52%
(1.66)
Sweden
Vasalunds IF
Stockholm Internazionale
GG
NG
48%
(2.09)
GG
52%
(1.65)
Poland
Lechia Gdansk
Wisla Plock
GG
NG
48%
(2.02)
GG
52%
(1.72)
Faroe Islands
NSI Runavik
B36 Torshavn
GG
NG
49%
(2.27)
GG
52%
(1.54)
Ireland
Wexford
UC Dublin
GG
NG
49%
(2.11)
GG
51%
(1.64)
Peru
Melgar Arequipa
Cienciano
GG
NG
49%
(2.12)
GG
51%
(1.64)
Uzbekistan
Xorazm Urganch
Navbahor Namangan
GG
NG
49%
(1.9)
GG
51%
(1.82)
Serbia
Radnicki Nis
Radnik Surdulica
GG
NG
49%
(1.93)
GG
51%
(1.78)
Vietnam
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
Song Lam Nghe An
GG
NG
49%
(1.86)
GG
51%
(1.84)


BTTS Betting Guide

Over the years I’ve come to appreciate how BTTS focuses on the excitement of goals without worrying about the final winner. BTTS stands out because it’s a simple market where you’re betting on whether both sides in a football match will score at least one goal each. To be honest coming up with tomorrow’s football BTTS predictions is usually the easiest.

I prefer BTTS because it’s less about picking a winner and more about predicting attacking flow, which can feel more reliable in football where underdogs often sneak a goal. From my experience, BTTS markets are popular in major leagues because they add layers to games that might otherwise seem one-sided.

Tomorrow's Football BTTS Predictions

Best Leagues and Match Types for BTTS Bets

Not every league or match is created equal for BTTS. Some are goal fests, others are snoozefests. Drawing from years of following global football, I’ll share where I’ve found the most success.

High-scoring leagues are your friends for BTTS Yes. The German Bundesliga tops the list with teams like Bayern and Dortmund play fast, attacking football, with averages often over 3 goals per game. I’ve cashed in on matches there where both sides score 70% of the time. The Dutch Eredivisie is similar, full of young, offensive talent and fewer defensive masterclasses. England’s Championship (second tier) is another hotspot, with unpredictable games and teams pushing for promotion.

For BTTS No, lean toward leagues with stout defenses. Italy’s Serie A can be cagey, especially in games involving teams like Inter or Napoli, where one side often keeps a clean sheet. France’s Ligue 1 sometimes fits, with PSG dominating but others focusing on survival through defense. Spain’s La Liga has its share of low-scorers too, like matches with Real Madrid against compact opponents.

Match types matter. Derbies are prime for BTTS Yes; think Manchester United vs. Manchester City or El Clasico. The rivalry amps up the intensity, leading to goals. End-of-season games can go either way: teams with nothing to play for might open up, while those in title or relegation battles get tense and defensive.

Midweek fixtures, like Champions League ties, often see BTTS due to fatigue and squad rotation. International breaks can disrupt form, creating mismatches. From my experience, avoid betting BTTS on early-season games when teams are still gelling. Wait for patterns to emerge. Target leagues you know well; I’ve stuck to Europe mostly, but MLS in the US offers fun, high-scoring options too.

Factors that Influence BTTS Outcomes

Football isn’t random; certain elements tip the scales. Understanding these can sharpen your edge.

First, attacking strength versus defensive weakness. If both teams have potent forwards but shaky backlines, BTTS Yes is often a lock. Take a team with a high goals-per-game average (say, over 1.5 scored) facing one that concedes plenty (over 1.5 per game). That’s a recipe for mutual scoring. In contrast, if one team dominates possession and shuts down attacks, like a prime Juventus in Serie A, BTTS No becomes appealing.

Player availability is huge. Injuries or suspensions to star attackers can kill a team’s scoring threat. Imagine betting BTTS Yes on a game where a side’s leading scorer is out. Goalkeepers matter too; a backup keeper prone to errors might let in soft goals, flipping a low-scoring matchup. I’ve adjusted bets last-minute based on team news, like when a key defender’s absence opened the floodgates.

Weather plays a role, especially in outdoor leagues. Heavy rain or wind can make games scrappy, reducing clear chances and favoring BTTS No. Hot, dry conditions might lead to more open play and goals. Motivation levels count as well especially teams fighting relegation often push hard for goals, while those safe in mid-table might settle for draws. Cup games, with their knockout stakes, can produce desperate attacks from trailing sides, boosting BTTS chances.

Tactics and styles are key. Managers who favor high pressing (like Jurgen Klopp’s teams) create turnovers and goals, while those who sit deep (think Jose Mourinho specials) stifle them. Look at recent games: if a team switches to a more offensive formation, that could signal BTTS potential.

From my bets, I’ve seen how these factors combine. In a Bundesliga clash between Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund, strong attacks on both sides, plus a history of high scores, scream BTTS Yes. But in a tight La Liga game between Atletico Madrid and a mid-table team, Diego Simeone’s defensive setup often leads to BTTS No. Weigh these elements together, and you’ll predict outcomes with more confidence.