Tomorrow’s Football BTTS Predictions

Tips for tomorrow August 3, 2025 Shows outcome probability of each result ( ) Displays the average odds for the bet
El Salvador
Platense Zacatecoluca
Alianza San Salvador
NG
NG
62%
(1.68)
GG
38%
(2.05)
Bulgaria
Lokomotiv Sofia
Montana
NG
NG
62%
(1.55)
GG
39%
(2.3)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
FK Sarajevo
Radnik Bijeljina
NG
NG
61%
(1.57)
GG
39%
(2.23)
Latvia
Auda Kekava
Metta Riga
NG
NG
60%
(1.68)
GG
40%
(2.02)
Russia
Fakel Voronezh
Sokol Saratov
NG
NG
60%
(1.44)
GG
40%
(2.62)
Argentina
Gimnasia Mendoza
Atletico Mitre
NG
NG
60%
(1.36)
GG
41%
(2.88)
Belarus
FC Smorgon
Dinamo Minsk
NG
NG
59%
(1.58)
GG
41%
(2.26)
Scotland
Celtic
Saint Mirren
NG
NG
59%
(1.71)
GG
41%
(2.04)
Argentina
Estudiantes Rio Cuarto
Talleres Remedios de Escalada
NG
NG
59%
(1.35)
GG
41%
(2.94)
Argentina
Los Andes
Racing de Cordoba
NG
NG
59%
(1.48)
GG
41%
(2.45)
Kazakhstan
Zhetysu Taldykorgan
Turan Turkistan
NG
NG
59%
(1.68)
GG
41%
(2.06)
Kazakhstan
Ordabasy Shymkent
Atyrau
NG
NG
59%
(1.34)
GG
41%
(2.94)
Brazil
Amazonas AM
Goias GO
NG
NG
58%
(1.64)
GG
42%
(2.14)
Brazil
Sao Bernardo SP
Tombense MG
NG
NG
58%
(1.41)
GG
42%
(2.64)
Colombia
Deportivo Pereira
Once Caldas
NG
NG
58%
(1.74)
GG
42%
(1.99)
Croatia
HNK Rijeka
Slaven Belupo
NG
NG
58%
(1.7)
GG
42%
(2.03)
Argentina
Patronato de Parana
Alvarado Mar del Plata
NG
NG
58%
(1.48)
GG
42%
(2.46)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Velez Mostar
Borac Banja Luka
NG
NG
58%
(1.72)
GG
42%
(1.99)
Bulgaria
Pirin Blagoevgrad
Minyor Pernik
NG
NG
57%
(1.63)
GG
43%
(2.08)
Bolivia
Real Tomayapo
Gualberto Villarroel San Jose
GG
NG
43%
(2.18)
GG
57%
(1.6)
Brazil
Atletico PR
Paysandu PA
NG
NG
57%
(1.59)
GG
43%
(2.22)
Russia
SKA-Khabarovsk
Torpedo Moskva
NG
NG
57%
(1.77)
GG
43%
(1.96)
Ireland
Shamrock Rovers
Derry City
NG
NG
57%
(1.61)
GG
43%
(2.2)
Kazakhstan
Aktobe
Zhenis Astana
NG
NG
57%
(1.65)
GG
43%
(2.1)
Russia
Chernomorets Novorossiysk
Arsenal Tula
NG
NG
57%
(1.61)
GG
43%
(2.21)
Chile
O'Higgins Rancagua
Union La Calera
NG
NG
57%
(1.65)
GG
43%
(2.12)
Brazil
Ceara CE
Flamengo RJ
NG
NG
57%
(1.64)
GG
43%
(2.14)
Argentina
Agropecuario Argentino
Temperley
NG
NG
57%
(1.57)
GG
43%
(2.23)
Brazil
Vitoria BA
Palmeiras SP
NG
NG
56%
(1.63)
GG
44%
(2.16)
Germany
Magdeburg
Eintracht Braunschweig
GG
NG
44%
(2.13)
GG
56%
(1.64)
Belgium
Union Saint-Gilloise
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
NG
NG
56%
(1.76)
GG
44%
(1.96)
Argentina
Chacarita Juniors
Estudiantes Buenos Aires
NG
NG
56%
(1.43)
GG
44%
(2.6)
Uruguay
Racing Club Montevideo
Montevideo Wanderers
NG
NG
56%
(1.66)
GG
44%
(2.08)
Guatemala
Coban Imperial
Municipal
NG
NG
56%
(1.74)
GG
44%
(1.97)
Colombia
Alianza Valledupar
Atletico Bucaramanga
NG
NG
56%
(1.65)
GG
44%
(2.11)
Switzerland
Etoile Carouge
Vaduz
GG
NG
44%
(2.37)
GG
56%
(1.5)
Ukraine
Karpaty Lviv
Polissya Zhytomyr
NG
NG
56%
(1.73)
GG
44%
(1.98)
Argentina
Nueva Chicago
Almirante Brown
NG
NG
56%
(1.47)
GG
44%
(2.5)
Peru
Sport Huancayo
Ayacucho FC
NG
NG
56%
(1.76)
GG
44%
(1.96)
Uruguay
Plaza Colonia
Miramar Misiones
NG
NG
56%
(1.61)
GG
44%
(2.16)
Germany
Greuther Furth
Dynamo Dresden
GG
NG
44%
(2.45)
GG
56%
(1.5)
Ukraine
Metalurg Zaporozhye
Metalist Kharkov
NG
NG
56%
(1.86)
GG
44%
(1.95)
Finland
Seinajoen JK
KTP Kotka
GG
NG
45%
(2.53)
GG
56%
(1.46)
Norway
Valerenga Oslo
Sandefjord
GG
NG
45%
(2.58)
GG
55%
(1.45)
Denmark
AGF Aarhus
FC Midtjylland
GG
NG
45%
(2.38)
GG
55%
(1.52)
Switzerland
Luzern
Zurich
GG
NG
45%
(2.45)
GG
55%
(1.49)
Denmark
Sonderjyske
FC Nordsjaelland
GG
NG
45%
(2.27)
GG
55%
(1.57)
Germany
Hannover
Kaiserslautern
GG
NG
45%
(2.25)
GG
55%
(1.57)
Germany
Wehen Wiesbaden
Ulm 1846
GG
NG
45%
(2.11)
GG
55%
(1.65)
Latvia
Grobinas SC
RFS Riga
GG
NG
45%
(1.68)
GG
55%
(2.03)
Denmark
Randers FC
Silkeborg
GG
NG
45%
(2.22)
GG
55%
(1.6)
Switzerland
Thun
Lausanne
GG
NG
46%
(2.33)
GG
54%
(1.54)
Hungary
Gyori ETO
Ujpest
GG
NG
46%
(2.71)
GG
54%
(1.4)
Sweden
Landskrona BoIS
Vasteras
GG
NG
46%
(2.24)
GG
54%
(1.58)
Norway
Alta
Tromsdalen
GG
NG
46%
(2.69)
GG
54%
(1.41)
Poland
Gornik Leczna
Puszcza Niepolomice
GG
NG
47%
(1.94)
GG
53%
(1.75)
Switzerland
Sion
Lugano
GG
NG
47%
(2.2)
GG
53%
(1.6)
Iceland
FH Hafnarfjordur
Vikingur Reykjavik
GG
NG
47%
(2.56)
GG
53%
(1.46)
Poland
Cracovia Krakow
Lechia Gdansk
GG
NG
47%
(2.41)
GG
53%
(1.51)
China
Wuhan Three Towns
Changchun Yatai
GG
NG
47%
(2.18)
GG
53%
(1.61)
Hungary
Kisvarda
Paksi
GG
NG
47%
(2.74)
GG
53%
(1.39)
Norway
KFUM Oslo
Rosenborg
GG
NG
47%
(2.03)
GG
53%
(1.72)
Norway
Stromsgodset
Haugesund
GG
NG
47%
(2.41)
GG
53%
(1.51)
Iceland
Breidablik Kopavogur
KA Akureyri
GG
NG
47%
(2.44)
GG
53%
(1.5)
Sweden
Hacken
Elfsborg
GG
NG
47%
(2.5)
GG
53%
(1.48)
Faroe Islands
B68 Toftir
NSI Runavik
GG
NG
47%
(1.97)
GG
53%
(1.75)
Canada
Forge FC
Valour FC
GG
NG
47%
(2.05)
GG
53%
(1.68)
Latvia
FK Tukums 2000
Riga FC
GG
NG
47%
(1.51)
GG
53%
(2.49)
China
Shenzhen Peng City
Zhejiang Professional
GG
NG
47%
(2.23)
GG
53%
(1.59)
Nicaragua
Real Madriz
Managua FC
GG
NG
47%
(2.1)
GG
53%
(1.65)
Mexico
Dorados de Sinaloa
Cancun
GG
NG
48%
(2.03)
GG
52%
(1.69)
Belgium
Genk
Royal Antwerp
GG
NG
48%
(2.16)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Hungary
Puskas Academy
Nyiregyhaza Spartacus
GG
NG
48%
(2.1)
GG
52%
(1.65)
Bolivia
The Strongest La Paz
Blooming Santa Cruz
GG
NG
48%
(2.12)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Slovakia
AS Trencin
Spartak Trnava
GG
NG
48%
(2.22)
GG
52%
(1.59)
Venezuela
Carabobo FC
Metropolitanos FC
GG
NG
48%
(1.83)
GG
52%
(1.87)
Serbia
Partizan Belgrade
Radnicki 1923
GG
NG
48%
(2.31)
GG
52%
(1.55)
Slovenia
Olimpija Ljubljana
NK Celje
GG
NG
48%
(2.46)
GG
52%
(1.48)
Mexico
Tlaxcala
Mineros de Zacatecas
GG
NG
48%
(1.91)
GG
52%
(1.78)
Canada
Atletico Ottawa
York United
GG
NG
48%
(2.14)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Poland
Radomiak Radom
Rakow Czestochowa
GG
NG
49%
(1.82)
GG
52%
(1.89)
Czech Republic
Viktoria Zizkov
SK Prostejov
GG
NG
49%
(2.03)
GG
51%
(1.69)
Estonia
Paide Linnameeskond
Harju JK Laagri
GG
NG
49%
(1.92)
GG
51%
(1.78)
Slovenia
NK Maribor
FC Koper
GG
NG
49%
(2.18)
GG
51%
(1.61)
Bolivia
Guabira Montero
Universitario de Vinto
GG
NG
49%
(2.01)
GG
51%
(1.71)
Estonia
Tartu Tammeka
Nomme Kalju
GG
NG
49%
(2.53)
GG
51%
(1.45)
Sweden
Sirius
Osters
GG
NG
49%
(2.06)
GG
51%
(1.69)
Ecuador
Universidad Catolica Quito
Aucas Quito
GG
NG
49%
(2.07)
GG
51%
(1.67)


BTTS Betting Guide

Over the years I’ve come to appreciate how BTTS focuses on the excitement of goals without worrying about the final winner. BTTS stands out because it’s a simple market where you’re betting on whether both sides in a football match will score at least one goal each. To be honest coming up with tomorrow’s football BTTS predictions is usually the easiest.

I prefer BTTS because it’s less about picking a winner and more about predicting attacking flow, which can feel more reliable in football where underdogs often sneak a goal. From my experience, BTTS markets are popular in major leagues because they add layers to games that might otherwise seem one-sided.

Tomorrow's Football BTTS Predictions

Best Leagues and Match Types for BTTS Bets

Not every league or match is created equal for BTTS. Some are goal fests, others are snoozefests. Drawing from years of following global football, I’ll share where I’ve found the most success.

High-scoring leagues are your friends for BTTS Yes. The German Bundesliga tops the list with teams like Bayern and Dortmund play fast, attacking football, with averages often over 3 goals per game. I’ve cashed in on matches there where both sides score 70% of the time. The Dutch Eredivisie is similar, full of young, offensive talent and fewer defensive masterclasses. England’s Championship (second tier) is another hotspot, with unpredictable games and teams pushing for promotion.

For BTTS No, lean toward leagues with stout defenses. Italy’s Serie A can be cagey, especially in games involving teams like Inter or Napoli, where one side often keeps a clean sheet. France’s Ligue 1 sometimes fits, with PSG dominating but others focusing on survival through defense. Spain’s La Liga has its share of low-scorers too, like matches with Real Madrid against compact opponents.

Match types matter. Derbies are prime for BTTS Yes; think Manchester United vs. Manchester City or El Clasico. The rivalry amps up the intensity, leading to goals. End-of-season games can go either way: teams with nothing to play for might open up, while those in title or relegation battles get tense and defensive.

Midweek fixtures, like Champions League ties, often see BTTS due to fatigue and squad rotation. International breaks can disrupt form, creating mismatches. From my experience, avoid betting BTTS on early-season games when teams are still gelling. Wait for patterns to emerge. Target leagues you know well; I’ve stuck to Europe mostly, but MLS in the US offers fun, high-scoring options too.

Factors that Influence BTTS Outcomes

Football isn’t random; certain elements tip the scales. Understanding these can sharpen your edge.

First, attacking strength versus defensive weakness. If both teams have potent forwards but shaky backlines, BTTS Yes is often a lock. Take a team with a high goals-per-game average (say, over 1.5 scored) facing one that concedes plenty (over 1.5 per game). That’s a recipe for mutual scoring. In contrast, if one team dominates possession and shuts down attacks, like a prime Juventus in Serie A, BTTS No becomes appealing.

Player availability is huge. Injuries or suspensions to star attackers can kill a team’s scoring threat. Imagine betting BTTS Yes on a game where a side’s leading scorer is out. Goalkeepers matter too; a backup keeper prone to errors might let in soft goals, flipping a low-scoring matchup. I’ve adjusted bets last-minute based on team news, like when a key defender’s absence opened the floodgates.

Weather plays a role, especially in outdoor leagues. Heavy rain or wind can make games scrappy, reducing clear chances and favoring BTTS No. Hot, dry conditions might lead to more open play and goals. Motivation levels count as well especially teams fighting relegation often push hard for goals, while those safe in mid-table might settle for draws. Cup games, with their knockout stakes, can produce desperate attacks from trailing sides, boosting BTTS chances.

Tactics and styles are key. Managers who favor high pressing (like Jurgen Klopp’s teams) create turnovers and goals, while those who sit deep (think Jose Mourinho specials) stifle them. Look at recent games: if a team switches to a more offensive formation, that could signal BTTS potential.

From my bets, I’ve seen how these factors combine. In a Bundesliga clash between Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund, strong attacks on both sides, plus a history of high scores, scream BTTS Yes. But in a tight La Liga game between Atletico Madrid and a mid-table team, Diego Simeone’s defensive setup often leads to BTTS No. Weigh these elements together, and you’ll predict outcomes with more confidence.