Tomorrow’s Football BTTS Predictions

Tips for tomorrow October 25, 2025 Shows outcome probability of each result ( ) Displays the average odds for the bet
Bulgaria
Lokomotiv Gorna Oryahovitsa
Minyor Pernik
NG
NG
61%
(1.73)
GG
39%
(1.94)
Northern Ireland
Linfield
Ballymena United
NG
NG
61%
(1.75)
GG
39%
(1.96)
Italy
Union Brescia
Albinoleffe
NG
NG
61%
(1.51)
GG
39%
(2.39)
Bulgaria
Chernomorets Burgas
Hebar Pazardzhik
NG
NG
59%
(1.65)
GG
41%
(2.06)
Belarus
FC Gomel
FC Slutsk
NG
NG
59%
(1.6)
GG
41%
(2.18)
Brazil
Volta Redonda RJ
Coritiba PR
NG
NG
59%
(1.67)
GG
41%
(2.07)
Colombia
Envigado FC
Boyaca Chico
NG
NG
58%
(1.71)
GG
42%
(2.02)
Italy
Parma
Como
NG
NG
58%
(1.93)
GG
42%
(1.8)
Spain
Talavera de la Reina
Osasuna B
NG
NG
58%
(1.77)
GG
42%
(1.94)
Colombia
Fortaleza CEIF
Deportivo Pasto
NG
NG
58%
(1.55)
GG
42%
(2.3)
Japan
Kyoto Sanga FC
Kashima Antlers
NG
NG
58%
(2.22)
GG
42%
(1.59)
Sweden
Karlbergs BK
Assyriska Foreningen
GG
NG
42%
(2.35)
GG
58%
(1.53)
Cyprus
Ethnikos Achna
Enosis Neon Paralimni
NG
NG
58%
(1.81)
GG
42%
(1.86)
Algeria
CS Constantine
Olympique Akbou
NG
NG
57%
(1.63)
GG
43%
(2.11)
Italy
Catanzaro
Palermo
NG
NG
57%
(1.86)
GG
43%
(1.87)
Austria
Rheindorf Altach
TSV Hartberg
NG
NG
57%
(1.83)
GG
43%
(1.89)
Japan
Kashiwa Reysol
Yokohama FC
NG
NG
57%
(1.8)
GG
43%
(1.93)
Brazil
Cuiaba MT
Remo PA
NG
NG
57%
(1.68)
GG
43%
(2.07)
Japan
Shimizu S-Pulse
Tokyo Verdy
NG
NG
57%
(1.7)
GG
43%
(2.05)
Brazil
Atletico MG
Ceara CE
NG
NG
57%
(1.6)
GG
43%
(2.21)
Greece
Ilioupoli
PAE Chania
NG
NG
57%
(1.66)
GG
43%
(2.11)
Germany
Hamburger
Wolfsburg
GG
NG
43%
(2.45)
GG
57%
(1.51)
England
Hartlepool
Solihull Moors
NG
NG
57%
(2.04)
GG
43%
(1.68)
Uruguay
Juventud de Las Piedras
Plaza Colonia
NG
NG
57%
(1.65)
GG
43%
(2.09)
Brazil
Vitoria BA
Corinthians SP
NG
NG
57%
(1.71)
GG
43%
(2.01)
Russia
Chernomorets Novorossiysk
FC Chelyabinsk
NG
NG
57%
(1.61)
GG
44%
(2.18)
Latvia
BFC Daugavpils
Super Nova Riga
GG
NG
44%
(2.05)
GG
56%
(1.67)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Rudar Prijedor
Zeljeznicar Sarajevo
NG
NG
56%
(1.89)
GG
44%
(1.8)
Italy
Udinese
Lecce
NG
NG
56%
(1.77)
GG
44%
(1.97)
Slovakia
FK Kosice
Zeleziarne Podbrezova
GG
NG
44%
(2.38)
GG
56%
(1.51)
Switzerland
Sion
Thun
GG
NG
44%
(2.21)
GG
56%
(1.6)
Austria
Austria Salzburg
Austria Wien II
GG
NG
44%
(2.18)
GG
56%
(1.6)
Poland
Pogon Siedlce
LKS Lodz
GG
NG
44%
(2.22)
GG
56%
(1.58)
Germany
Borussia M'gladbach
Bayern Munchen
GG
NG
44%
(2.23)
GG
56%
(1.6)
Peru
Alianza Atletico
Cienciano
NG
NG
56%
(1.94)
GG
44%
(1.76)
Guatemala
Deportivo Mixco
Deportivo Mictlan
NG
NG
56%
(1.5)
GG
44%
(2.39)
Australia
Sydney FC
Central Coast Mariners
GG
NG
44%
(2.22)
GG
56%
(1.59)
Germany
Verl
Ulm 1846
GG
NG
44%
(2.39)
GG
56%
(1.5)
Estonia
Harju JK Laagri
Narva Trans
GG
NG
44%
N/A
GG
56%
N/A
Switzerland
Winterthur
Luzern
GG
NG
44%
(2.34)
GG
56%
(1.54)
Ukraine
Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
LNZ Cherkasy
NG
NG
56%
(1.59)
GG
44%
(2.19)
Netherlands
Fortuna Sittard
FC Groningen
GG
NG
44%
(1.98)
GG
56%
(1.76)
Norway
Sarpsborg 08
KFUM Oslo
GG
NG
45%
(2.1)
GG
55%
(1.66)
Denmark
AAB Aalborg
Lyngby
GG
NG
45%
(2.25)
GG
55%
(1.57)
Norway
IL Sandviken
Brattvag IL
GG
NG
45%
(2.75)
GG
55%
(1.38)
Sweden
Sollentuna FK
United IK Nordic
GG
NG
45%
(2.18)
GG
55%
(1.6)
Norway
Asane
Start Kristiansand
GG
NG
45%
(2.16)
GG
55%
(1.62)
Denmark
Aarhus Fremad
Esbjerg
GG
NG
45%
(2.28)
GG
55%
(1.54)
Sweden
Sandvikens IF
Utsiktens
GG
NG
45%
(2.19)
GG
55%
(1.61)
Sweden
Ariana
Olympic Malmo
GG
NG
45%
(2.23)
GG
55%
(1.57)
Slovakia
FK Puchov
Tatran Liptovsky Mikulas
GG
NG
45%
(2.21)
GG
55%
(1.58)
Germany
Jahn Regensburg
Stuttgart II
GG
NG
45%
(2.31)
GG
55%
(1.53)
Bolivia
Guabira Montero
Blooming Santa Cruz
GG
NG
45%
(2.26)
GG
55%
(1.56)
Norway
Lyn Oslo
Kongsvinger
GG
NG
45%
(2.69)
GG
55%
(1.4)
Germany
Schweinfurt 05
Osnabruck
GG
NG
46%
(2.06)
GG
55%
(1.66)
Poland
Polonia Warszawa
Polonia Bytom
GG
NG
46%
(2.36)
GG
54%
(1.52)
Australia
Melbourne City
Perth Glory
GG
NG
46%
(2.11)
GG
54%
(1.66)
Sweden
Brage
Helsingborgs
GG
NG
46%
(2.25)
GG
54%
(1.58)
Sweden
Trollhattans
Jonkopings Sodra
GG
NG
46%
(2.15)
GG
54%
(1.62)
South Korea
Suwon Samsung Bluewings
Jeonnam Dragons
GG
NG
46%
(2.28)
GG
54%
(1.56)
England
Tamworth
Boston United
GG
NG
46%
(1.92)
GG
54%
(1.77)
Australia
Auckland FC
Western Sydney Wanderers
GG
NG
46%
(2.07)
GG
54%
(1.68)
Israel
Hapoel Haifa
Beitar Jerusalem
GG
NG
46%
(2.24)
GG
54%
(1.56)
Faroe Islands
Vikingur Gota
HB Torshavn
GG
NG
46%
(2.59)
GG
54%
(1.43)
Norway
Sogndal
Egersunds
GG
NG
46%
(2.53)
GG
54%
(1.46)
Germany
Waldhof Mannheim
Munchen 1860
GG
NG
46%
(2.19)
GG
54%
(1.58)
Turkey
Sakaryaspor
Keciorengucu
GG
NG
46%
(2.13)
GG
54%
(1.63)
France
Brest
Paris Saint Germain
GG
NG
46%
(2.02)
GG
54%
(1.72)
Netherlands
FC Volendam
Heracles Almelo
GG
NG
46%
(2.4)
GG
54%
(1.52)
Germany
Arminia Bielefeld
Elversberg
GG
NG
46%
(2.57)
GG
54%
(1.45)
Sweden
AFC Eskilstuna
Stockholm Internazionale
GG
NG
46%
(2.06)
GG
54%
(1.67)
Slovakia
Inter Bratislava
Slavia TU Kosice
GG
NG
46%
(2)
GG
54%
(1.72)
Belgium
Westerlo
Dender
GG
NG
47%
(2.21)
GG
54%
(1.6)
Israel
Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Tel Aviv
GG
NG
47%
(2.33)
GG
54%
(1.53)
Hungary
Diosgyori
Paksi
GG
NG
47%
(2.66)
GG
54%
(1.42)
Poland
GKS Katowice
Korona Kielce
GG
NG
47%
(2.09)
GG
54%
(1.66)
England
Gateshead
Truro City
GG
NG
47%
(2.14)
GG
54%
(1.62)
Germany
Augsburg
RB Leipzig
GG
NG
47%
(2.73)
GG
53%
(1.41)
England
Manchester United
Brighton
GG
NG
47%
(2.52)
GG
53%
(1.48)
England
Braintree
Altrincham
GG
NG
47%
(2.23)
GG
53%
(1.57)
Germany
Ingolstadt
Saarbrucken
GG
NG
47%
(2.51)
GG
53%
(1.45)
Germany
Energie Cottbus
Havelse
GG
NG
47%
(2.12)
GG
53%
(1.62)
Sweden
Osters
Degerfors
GG
NG
47%
(2.09)
GG
53%
(1.66)
Qatar
Al-Sadd SC Doha
Al-Arabi SC Doha
GG
NG
47%
(2.74)
GG
53%
(1.39)
Slovakia
MFK Zemplin Michalovce
DAC Dunajska Streda
GG
NG
47%
(2.06)
GG
53%
(1.67)
Norway
Moss FK
Aalesunds
GG
NG
47%
(2.3)
GG
53%
(1.54)
Sweden
Oskarshamns AIK
Lunds
GG
NG
47%
(2.27)
GG
53%
(1.55)
Germany
Holstein Kiel
Bochum
GG
NG
47%
(2.3)
GG
53%
(1.55)
Hungary
Puskas Academy
MTK Budapest
GG
NG
47%
(2.39)
GG
53%
(1.51)
Slovakia
Redfox FC Stara Lubovna
Slovan Bratislava B
GG
NG
47%
(2.16)
GG
53%
(1.59)
Japan
Fujieda MYFC
Ventforet Kofu
GG
NG
47%
(2.02)
GG
53%
(1.71)
England
Wealdstone
Sutton United
GG
NG
47%
(2.21)
GG
53%
(1.58)
Austria
Rapid Wien II
Austria Lustenau
GG
NG
47%
(2.03)
GG
53%
(1.69)
Japan
V-Varen Nagasaki
Imabari
GG
NG
47%
(2.17)
GG
53%
(1.61)
Norway
Hodd
Stabaek
GG
NG
47%
(2.22)
GG
53%
(1.57)
Germany
Dynamo Dresden
Paderborn
GG
NG
47%
(2.32)
GG
53%
(1.54)
Slovakia
Banik Lehota pod Vtacnikom
Dukla Banska Bystrica
GG
NG
47%
(1.81)
GG
53%
(1.88)
Netherlands
FC Zwolle
NEC Nijmegen
GG
NG
47%
(2.59)
GG
53%
(1.45)
Portugal
Pacos Ferreira
Portimonense
GG
NG
47%
(1.93)
GG
53%
(1.76)
Poland
Pogon Szczecin
Cracovia Krakow
GG
NG
47%
(2.23)
GG
53%
(1.59)
Wales
Pen-y-Bont FC
Caernarfon Town
GG
NG
47%
(2.3)
GG
53%
(1.55)
Mexico
Alebrijes de Oaxaca
Tepatitlan
GG
NG
47%
(2.27)
GG
53%
(1.55)
England
Forest Green
Boreham Wood
GG
NG
47%
(1.94)
GG
53%
(1.76)
England
Halifax
York City
GG
NG
48%
(2.13)
GG
53%
(1.63)
Mexico
Mazatlan
Club America Mexico
GG
NG
48%
(2)
GG
52%
(1.72)
Venezuela
Monagas SC
Deportivo La Guaira
GG
NG
48%
(1.81)
GG
52%
(1.88)
Norway
Lillestrom
Ranheim
GG
NG
48%
(2.06)
GG
52%
(1.68)
Wales
Cardiff Metropolitan
Flint Town United
GG
NG
48%
(2.19)
GG
52%
(1.59)
Indonesia
Persik Kediri
PSM Makassar
GG
NG
48%
(1.86)
GG
52%
(1.83)
Belarus
Naftan Novopolotsk
Dinamo Minsk
GG
NG
48%
(1.58)
GG
52%
(2.22)
Sweden
Djurgardens
IFK Varnamo
GG
NG
48%
(1.96)
GG
52%
(1.76)
England
Barnsley
Rotherham
GG
NG
48%
(2.23)
GG
52%
(1.59)
Slovenia
NK Radomlje
FC Koper
GG
NG
48%
(2.04)
GG
52%
(1.66)
El Salvador
Zacatecoluca FC
Aguila San Miguel
GG
NG
48%
(1.95)
GG
52%
(1.76)
England
Brentford
Liverpool
GG
NG
48%
(2.36)
GG
52%
(1.54)
England
Wycombe
Huddersfield
GG
NG
48%
(1.96)
GG
52%
(1.76)
France
Monaco
Toulouse
GG
NG
48%
(2.29)
GG
52%
(1.56)
England
Swindon
Colchester
GG
NG
48%
(2.17)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Israel
Ironi Tiberias
Maccabi Haifa
GG
NG
48%
(1.95)
GG
52%
(1.75)
Sweden
Oddevold
Ostersunds
GG
NG
48%
(2.11)
GG
52%
(1.64)
Mexico
Atletico La Paz
Irapuato
GG
NG
48%
(2.47)
GG
52%
(1.48)
Switzerland
Bellinzona
Lausanne-Ouchy
GG
NG
48%
(2.05)
GG
52%
(1.67)
Germany
Hertha Berlin
Fortuna Dusseldorf
GG
NG
49%
(2.37)
GG
52%
(1.52)
Spain
Valencia
Villarreal
GG
NG
49%
(2.1)
GG
52%
(1.68)
Israel
M.S. Ashdod
Hapoel Petah Tikva
GG
NG
49%
(2.21)
GG
52%
(1.58)
Serbia
Zeleznicar Pancevo
FK Cukaricki
GG
NG
49%
(2.21)
GG
51%
(1.61)
England
Cheltenham
Walsall
GG
NG
49%
(1.83)
GG
51%
(1.88)
Japan
Cerezo Osaka
Kawasaki Frontale
GG
NG
49%
(2.72)
GG
51%
(1.41)
Slovakia
MSK Zilina
MFK Skalica
GG
NG
49%
(2.02)
GG
51%
(1.71)
China
Henan FC
Zhejiang Professional
GG
NG
49%
(2.96)
GG
51%
(1.35)
Russia
Spartak Moskva
FC Orenburg
GG
NG
49%
(2.11)
GG
51%
(1.69)
Chile
Deportes La Serena
Audax Italiano
GG
NG
49%
(2.14)
GG
51%
(1.63)
Spain
Burgos CF
Real Sociedad B
GG
NG
49%
(1.62)
GG
51%
(2.15)
England
Woking
Rochdale
GG
NG
49%
(2.07)
GG
51%
(1.65)
Latvia
FK Liepaja
FS Jelgava
GG
NG
49%
(1.96)
GG
51%
(1.72)
Wales
Connah's Quay Nomads
Haverfordwest County
GG
NG
49%
(1.75)
GG
51%
(1.96)
Wales
Bala Town
Barry Town United
GG
NG
49%
(2.16)
GG
51%
(1.62)
England
Peterborough
Blackpool
GG
NG
49%
(2.15)
GG
51%
(1.63)
England
Coventry
Watford
GG
NG
49%
(2)
GG
51%
(1.74)
Portugal
Uniao Leiria
Leixoes
GG
NG
49%
(1.81)
GG
51%
(1.86)
Slovakia
AS Trencin
KFC Komarno
GG
NG
49%
(2.15)
GG
51%
(1.63)
Spain
Albacete
Cordoba
GG
NG
49%
(2.18)
GG
51%
(1.6)
Czech Republic
Hanacka Slavia Kromeriz
Vysocina Jihlava
GG
NG
49%
(2.05)
GG
51%
(1.68)
Singapore
Young Lions
Geylang International
GG
NG
49%
(2.35)
GG
51%
(1.53)
England
Ipswich
West Bromwich
GG
NG
49%
(1.87)
GG
51%
(1.83)
Norway
Skeid
Raufoss IL
GG
NG
49%
(2.22)
GG
51%
(1.58)


BTTS Betting Guide

Over the years I’ve come to appreciate how BTTS focuses on the excitement of goals without worrying about the final winner. BTTS stands out because it’s a simple market where you’re betting on whether both sides in a football match will score at least one goal each. To be honest coming up with tomorrow’s football BTTS predictions is usually the easiest.

I prefer BTTS because it’s less about picking a winner and more about predicting attacking flow, which can feel more reliable in football where underdogs often sneak a goal. From my experience, BTTS markets are popular in major leagues because they add layers to games that might otherwise seem one-sided.

Tomorrow's Football BTTS Predictions

Best Leagues and Match Types for BTTS Bets

Not every league or match is created equal for BTTS. Some are goal fests, others are snoozefests. Drawing from years of following global football, I’ll share where I’ve found the most success.

High-scoring leagues are your friends for BTTS Yes. The German Bundesliga tops the list with teams like Bayern and Dortmund play fast, attacking football, with averages often over 3 goals per game. I’ve cashed in on matches there where both sides score 70% of the time. The Dutch Eredivisie is similar, full of young, offensive talent and fewer defensive masterclasses. England’s Championship (second tier) is another hotspot, with unpredictable games and teams pushing for promotion.

For BTTS No, lean toward leagues with stout defenses. Italy’s Serie A can be cagey, especially in games involving teams like Inter or Napoli, where one side often keeps a clean sheet. France’s Ligue 1 sometimes fits, with PSG dominating but others focusing on survival through defense. Spain’s La Liga has its share of low-scorers too, like matches with Real Madrid against compact opponents.

Match types matter. Derbies are prime for BTTS Yes; think Manchester United vs. Manchester City or El Clasico. The rivalry amps up the intensity, leading to goals. End-of-season games can go either way: teams with nothing to play for might open up, while those in title or relegation battles get tense and defensive.

Midweek fixtures, like Champions League ties, often see BTTS due to fatigue and squad rotation. International breaks can disrupt form, creating mismatches. From my experience, avoid betting BTTS on early-season games when teams are still gelling. Wait for patterns to emerge. Target leagues you know well; I’ve stuck to Europe mostly, but MLS in the US offers fun, high-scoring options too.

Factors that Influence BTTS Outcomes

Football isn’t random; certain elements tip the scales. Understanding these can sharpen your edge.

First, attacking strength versus defensive weakness. If both teams have potent forwards but shaky backlines, BTTS Yes is often a lock. Take a team with a high goals-per-game average (say, over 1.5 scored) facing one that concedes plenty (over 1.5 per game). That’s a recipe for mutual scoring. In contrast, if one team dominates possession and shuts down attacks, like a prime Juventus in Serie A, BTTS No becomes appealing.

Player availability is huge. Injuries or suspensions to star attackers can kill a team’s scoring threat. Imagine betting BTTS Yes on a game where a side’s leading scorer is out. Goalkeepers matter too; a backup keeper prone to errors might let in soft goals, flipping a low-scoring matchup. I’ve adjusted bets last-minute based on team news, like when a key defender’s absence opened the floodgates.

Weather plays a role, especially in outdoor leagues. Heavy rain or wind can make games scrappy, reducing clear chances and favoring BTTS No. Hot, dry conditions might lead to more open play and goals. Motivation levels count as well especially teams fighting relegation often push hard for goals, while those safe in mid-table might settle for draws. Cup games, with their knockout stakes, can produce desperate attacks from trailing sides, boosting BTTS chances.

Tactics and styles are key. Managers who favor high pressing (like Jurgen Klopp’s teams) create turnovers and goals, while those who sit deep (think Jose Mourinho specials) stifle them. Look at recent games: if a team switches to a more offensive formation, that could signal BTTS potential.

From my bets, I’ve seen how these factors combine. In a Bundesliga clash between Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund, strong attacks on both sides, plus a history of high scores, scream BTTS Yes. But in a tight La Liga game between Atletico Madrid and a mid-table team, Diego Simeone’s defensive setup often leads to BTTS No. Weigh these elements together, and you’ll predict outcomes with more confidence.