Tomorrow’s Football BTTS Predictions

Tips for tomorrow September 13, 2025 Shows outcome probability of each result ( ) Displays the average odds for the bet
Cyprus
Pafos FC
Apollon Limassol
NG
NG
62%
(1.68)
GG
38%
(2.05)
Algeria
ASO Chlef
MC El Bayadh
NG
NG
61%
(1.43)
GG
39%
(2.61)
Latvia
RFS Riga
FS Jelgava
NG
NG
61%
(1.64)
GG
39%
(2.08)
Bulgaria
Etar Veliko Tarnovo
Spartak Pleven
NG
NG
61%
(1.63)
GG
39%
(2.09)
Greece
Olympiacos Piraeus
Panserraikos
NG
NG
61%
(1.45)
GG
39%
(2.57)
Italy
Pontedera
Rimini
NG
NG
61%
(1.64)
GG
40%
(2.13)
Latvia
Riga FC
Auda Kekava
NG
NG
60%
(1.74)
GG
40%
(1.97)
Argentina
Independiente
Banfield
NG
NG
60%
(1.54)
GG
40%
(2.36)
Tunisia
US Monastir
Etoile du Sahel Sousse
NG
NG
60%
(1.5)
GG
40%
(2.41)
Argentina
Deportivo Moron
Temperley
NG
NG
60%
(1.41)
GG
40%
(2.67)
Algeria
USM Alger
USM Khenchela
NG
NG
59%
(1.43)
GG
41%
(2.58)
Ukraine
Obolon Kiev
Dinamo Kiev
NG
NG
59%
(1.52)
GG
41%
(2.35)
Algeria
CR Belouizdad
JS Saoura
NG
NG
59%
(1.5)
GG
41%
(2.43)
Argentina
Estudiantes Buenos Aires
Defensores Unidos
NG
NG
59%
(1.4)
GG
41%
(2.71)
Argentina
Lanus
Independiente Rivadavia
NG
NG
59%
(1.52)
GG
41%
(2.39)
Czech Republic
Slavia Prague
Karvina
NG
NG
59%
(1.65)
GG
41%
(2.12)
Spain
Sevilla Atletico
Betis Deportivo Balompie
NG
NG
59%
(1.8)
GG
42%
(1.92)
Northern Ireland
Larne
Glenavon
NG
NG
58%
(1.71)
GG
42%
(2)
Brazil
Palmeiras SP
Internacional RS
NG
NG
58%
(1.66)
GG
42%
(2.1)
Belarus
FC Smorgon
Naftan Novopolotsk
NG
NG
58%
(1.85)
GG
42%
(1.85)
England
West Bromwich
Derby County
NG
NG
58%
(1.66)
GG
42%
(2.12)
Brazil
Fortaleza CE
Vitoria BA
NG
NG
58%
(1.76)
GG
42%
(1.97)
Egypt
Haras El Hodoud
El Gouna
NG
NG
58%
(1.52)
GG
42%
(2.35)
Portugal
Porto
Nacional
NG
NG
58%
(1.56)
GG
42%
(2.29)
Argentina
Defensores de Belgrano
Chaco For Ever
NG
NG
58%
(1.44)
GG
42%
(2.57)
Egypt
Ceramica Cleopatra
Smouha SC
NG
NG
58%
(1.57)
GG
42%
(2.23)
Sweden
Husqvarna FF
Angelholms
GG
NG
43%
(2.56)
GG
58%
(1.45)
Iran
Persepolis Tehran
Foolad Khuzestan Ahvaz
NG
NG
58%
(1.53)
GG
43%
(2.32)
Brazil
Caxias RS
Sao Bernardo SP
NG
NG
57%
(1.64)
GG
43%
(2.09)
Bulgaria
Marek Dupnitsa
Lokomotiv Gorna Oryahovitsa
NG
NG
57%
(1.62)
GG
43%
(2.12)
Colombia
Junior Barranquilla
La Equidad Bogota
NG
NG
57%
(1.58)
GG
43%
(2.23)
Uruguay
Cerro Largo Melo
Defensor Sporting
NG
NG
57%
(1.63)
GG
43%
(2.13)
Guatemala
Deportivo Mixco
Marquense
NG
NG
57%
(1.51)
GG
43%
(2.38)
Venezuela
Zamora Barinas
Rayo Zuliano
NG
NG
57%
(1.63)
GG
43%
(2.13)
Argentina
Godoy Cruz Antonio Tomba
Barracas Central
NG
NG
57%
(1.55)
GG
43%
(2.33)
Italy
Sampdoria
Cesena
NG
NG
57%
(1.65)
GG
43%
(2.12)
Qatar
Al-Ahli SC Doha
Al-Wakrah SC
GG
NG
43%
(2.35)
GG
57%
(1.53)
Kazakhstan
Atyrau
Tobol Kostanay
NG
NG
57%
(1.81)
GG
43%
(1.89)
Paraguay
Sportivo Luqueno
Libertad Asuncion
NG
NG
57%
(1.74)
GG
43%
(1.97)
Iceland
Throttur Reykjavik
Thor Akureyri
GG
NG
43%
(3.04)
GG
57%
(1.33)
Qatar
Al-Shamal SC
Al-Arabi SC Doha
GG
NG
43%
(2.67)
GG
57%
(1.4)
Bolivia
Nacional Potosi
San Antonio Bulo Bulo
GG
NG
43%
(2.44)
GG
57%
(1.48)
Brazil
Coritiba PR
Goias GO
NG
NG
57%
(1.54)
GG
43%
(2.34)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Rudar Prijedor
Velez Mostar
NG
NG
57%
(1.74)
GG
43%
(1.96)
Italy
Juve Stabia
Reggiana 1919
NG
NG
57%
(1.68)
GG
43%
(2.07)
Spain
Athletic Bilbao
Deportivo Alaves
NG
NG
57%
(1.61)
GG
43%
(2.2)
Belarus
FC Slutsk
BATE Borisov
NG
NG
57%
(1.84)
GG
43%
(1.86)
Germany
Freiburg
Stuttgart
GG
NG
44%
(2.48)
GG
56%
(1.49)
Spain
Mirandes
Deportivo La Coruna
NG
NG
56%
(1.71)
GG
44%
(2.02)
UAE
Al-Jazira Abu Dhabi
Al-Nasr Dubai
GG
NG
44%
(2.37)
GG
56%
(1.53)
Germany
Karlsruher
Nurnberg
GG
NG
44%
(2.15)
GG
56%
(1.63)
Poland
Stal Rzeszow
Znicz Pruszkow
GG
NG
44%
(2.37)
GG
56%
(1.51)
Sweden
Torslanda IK
Olympic Malmo
GG
NG
44%
(2.31)
GG
56%
(1.54)
England
Tranmere Rovers
Newport County
NG
NG
56%
(1.87)
GG
44%
(1.84)
UAE
Al-Wasl Dubai
Al-Ain FC
GG
NG
44%
(2.53)
GG
56%
(1.45)
Iceland
Volsungur Husavik
HK Kopavogur
GG
NG
44%
(2.73)
GG
56%
(1.39)
Tunisia
Stade Tunisien Tunis
Esperance de Tunis
NG
NG
56%
(1.71)
GG
44%
(2)
Norway
Egersunds
Stabaek
GG
NG
44%
(2.55)
GG
56%
(1.45)
Greece
Atromitos Athens
Aris Thessaloniki
NG
NG
56%
(1.7)
GG
44%
(2.05)
Switzerland
Bellinzona
Rapperswil-Jona
GG
NG
44%
(2.08)
GG
56%
(1.66)
Netherlands
NEC Nijmegen
PSV Eindhoven
GG
NG
45%
(2.81)
GG
56%
(1.39)
Norway
Start Kristiansand
Kongsvinger
GG
NG
45%
(2.6)
GG
55%
(1.43)
Norway
Ranheim
Asane
GG
NG
45%
(2.3)
GG
55%
(1.54)
Belgium
Club Brugge NXT
RFC Liege
GG
NG
45%
(2.19)
GG
55%
(1.59)
South Korea
Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors
Daejeon Hana Citizen
GG
NG
45%
(2.02)
GG
55%
(1.71)
Iceland
Selfoss
Keflavik IF
GG
NG
45%
(2.8)
GG
55%
(1.38)
China
Qingdao West Coast
Zhejiang Professional
GG
NG
45%
(2.53)
GG
55%
(1.46)
Germany
Schalke 04
Holstein Kiel
GG
NG
45%
(2.2)
GG
55%
(1.61)
Germany
Duisburg
Wehen Wiesbaden
GG
NG
45%
(2.38)
GG
55%
(1.5)
Switzerland
Zurich
Servette
GG
NG
45%
(2.41)
GG
55%
(1.51)
Germany
Wolfsburg
FC Koln
GG
NG
45%
(2.09)
GG
55%
(1.67)
Switzerland
Aarau
Vaduz
GG
NG
45%
(2.46)
GG
55%
(1.47)
Norway
Raufoss IL
Aalesunds
GG
NG
45%
(2.2)
GG
55%
(1.6)
Netherlands
VVV-Venlo
Helmond Sport
GG
NG
45%
(2.46)
GG
55%
(1.5)
Scotland
Aberdeen
Livingston
GG
NG
45%
(2.02)
GG
55%
(1.73)
Scotland
Alloa Athletic
Montrose
GG
NG
46%
(1.98)
GG
55%
(1.74)
Estonia
Flora Tallinn
Parnu Vaprus
GG
NG
46%
(2.05)
GG
55%
(1.66)
Switzerland
St. Gallen
Lugano
GG
NG
46%
(2.32)
GG
55%
(1.55)
Sweden
AFC Eskilstuna
Gefle
GG
NG
46%
(2.32)
GG
55%
(1.53)
Sweden
Sundsvall
Varbergs BoIS
GG
NG
46%
(1.95)
GG
55%
(1.78)
Sweden
United IK Nordic
Hammarby Talang FF
GG
NG
46%
(2.24)
GG
55%
(1.57)
Germany
Stuttgart II
Saarbrucken
GG
NG
46%
(2.29)
GG
54%
(1.55)
England
Bournemouth
Brighton
GG
NG
46%
(2.33)
GG
54%
(1.55)
Austria
Admira Wacker Modling
Schwarz-Weiss Bregenz
GG
NG
46%
(1.98)
GG
54%
(1.74)
Thailand
Ratchaburi FC
Port Bangkok
GG
NG
46%
(2.43)
GG
54%
(1.49)
Germany
Union Berlin
Hoffenheim
GG
NG
46%
(2.09)
GG
54%
(1.67)
Germany
Erzgebirge Aue
Viktoria Koln
GG
NG
46%
(2.15)
GG
54%
(1.61)
Denmark
Brondby
FC Copenhagen
GG
NG
46%
(2.15)
GG
54%
(1.64)
England
Everton
Aston Villa
GG
NG
46%
(1.97)
GG
54%
(1.77)
Sweden
Oddevold
Brage
GG
NG
46%
(2.07)
GG
54%
(1.69)
Slovakia
STK 1914 Samorin
Inter Bratislava
GG
NG
46%
(2.14)
GG
54%
(1.6)
Belgium
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
Lommel
GG
NG
46%
(1.95)
GG
54%
(1.76)
Scotland
Elgin City
Stirling Albion
GG
NG
46%
(2.19)
GG
54%
(1.61)
Sweden
Orebro
Ostersunds
GG
NG
46%
(2.27)
GG
54%
(1.56)
Thailand
Chonburi
Bangkok United
GG
NG
46%
(2.39)
GG
54%
(1.5)
Wales
Briton Ferry Llansawel
Caernarfon Town
GG
NG
46%
(2.7)
GG
54%
(1.4)
Venezuela
Metropolitanos FC
Estudiantes de Merida
GG
NG
46%
(2.13)
GG
54%
(1.65)
Iceland
Fjolnir Reykjavik
Leiknir Reykjavik
GG
NG
46%
(2.67)
GG
54%
(1.41)
Norway
Brann Bergen
Valerenga Oslo
GG
NG
46%
(2.5)
GG
54%
(1.48)
Belgium
Francs Borains
Eupen
GG
NG
46%
(2.04)
GG
54%
(1.68)
England
Wealdstone
Gateshead
GG
NG
47%
(2.31)
GG
53%
(1.52)
Thailand
Sukhothai FC
Lamphun Warriors
GG
NG
47%
(2.11)
GG
53%
(1.62)
Germany
Alemannia Aachen
Ulm 1846
GG
NG
47%
(1.93)
GG
53%
(1.75)
Germany
Hannover
Hertha Berlin
GG
NG
47%
(2.2)
GG
53%
(1.61)
Slovakia
MSK Zilina
Slovan Bratislava
GG
NG
47%
(2.71)
GG
53%
(1.4)
Sweden
Ariana
IFK Skovde
GG
NG
47%
(2.01)
GG
53%
(1.7)
Austria
Wolfsberger AC
Red Bull Salzburg
GG
NG
47%
(2.25)
GG
53%
(1.58)
Poland
Korona Kielce
Pogon Szczecin
GG
NG
47%
(2.24)
GG
53%
(1.58)
Scotland
Annan Athletic
Clyde
GG
NG
47%
(2.43)
GG
53%
(1.5)
Canada
Cavalry FC
HFX Wanderers FC
GG
NG
47%
(1.97)
GG
53%
(1.73)
England
Peterborough
Wycombe
GG
NG
47%
(2.12)
GG
53%
(1.65)
Sweden
IFK Stocksund
Stockholm Internazionale
GG
NG
47%
(1.93)
GG
53%
(1.76)
Switzerland
Thun
Basel
GG
NG
47%
(2.64)
GG
53%
(1.43)
Germany
Mainz
RB Leipzig
GG
NG
47%
(2.39)
GG
53%
(1.52)
Turkey
Besiktas
Istanbul Basaksehir
GG
NG
47%
(2.12)
GG
53%
(1.65)
England
Fulham
Leeds
GG
NG
47%
(1.92)
GG
53%
(1.82)
England
Boreham Wood
Altrincham
GG
NG
47%
(2.13)
GG
53%
(1.62)
France
Auxerre
Monaco
GG
NG
48%
(2.3)
GG
53%
(1.55)
England
Barnsley
Reading
GG
NG
48%
(2.3)
GG
53%
(1.55)
England
Sutton United
Tamworth
GG
NG
48%
(2.11)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Mexico
Necaxa
Juarez
GG
NG
48%
(2)
GG
52%
(1.74)
Czech Republic
Teplice
Mlada Boleslav
GG
NG
48%
(2.08)
GG
52%
(1.67)
Austria
Rheindorf Altach
LASK Linz
GG
NG
48%
(1.95)
GG
52%
(1.78)
Austria
Austria Wien II
First Vienna FC 1894
GG
NG
48%
(2.07)
GG
52%
(1.68)
Sweden
IFK Haninge
Orebro Syrianska IF
GG
NG
48%
(2.75)
GG
52%
(1.39)
Scotland
East Fife
Queen of the South
GG
NG
48%
(2.06)
GG
52%
(1.68)
England
Crewe
Barnet
GG
NG
48%
(2.13)
GG
52%
(1.64)
Russia
Akhmat Grozny
Lokomotiv Moskva
GG
NG
48%
(1.99)
GG
52%
(1.78)
Japan
Consadole Sapporo
Iwaki FC
GG
NG
48%
(2.11)
GG
52%
(1.65)
Denmark
Kolding
Hvidovre
GG
NG
48%
(1.91)
GG
52%
(1.78)
Saudi Arabia
Al-Khaleej Saihat
Al-Fayha
GG
NG
48%
(1.92)
GG
52%
(1.78)
Turkey
Fatih Karagumruk
Kasimpasa
GG
NG
48%
(2.07)
GG
52%
(1.68)
Germany
Heidenheim
Borussia Dortmund
GG
NG
48%
(2.28)
GG
52%
(1.56)
Japan
Omiya Ardija
V-Varen Nagasaki
GG
NG
48%
(2.14)
GG
52%
(1.63)
Mexico
Mazatlan
Pumas UNAM
GG
NG
48%
(1.86)
GG
52%
(1.87)
Northern Ireland
Portadown
Coleraine
GG
NG
48%
(1.85)
GG
52%
(1.83)
Czech Republic
MFK Chrudim
Usti nad Labem
GG
NG
48%
(2.33)
GG
52%
(1.54)
Chile
Union Espanola
Audax Italiano
GG
NG
48%
(2.1)
GG
52%
(1.66)
South Korea
Chungnam Asan
Bucheon FC 1995
GG
NG
48%
(2.1)
GG
52%
(1.65)
Belgium
Zulte Waregem
Oud-Heverlee Leuven
GG
NG
48%
(2.02)
GG
52%
(1.72)
Italy
Cagliari
Parma
GG
NG
49%
(1.82)
GG
52%
(1.9)
England
Yeovil
Woking
GG
NG
49%
(1.84)
GG
52%
(1.85)
England
West Ham
Tottenham
GG
NG
49%
(2.19)
GG
51%
(1.61)
Bolivia
Bolivar La Paz
Guabira Montero
GG
NG
49%
(1.8)
GG
51%
(1.89)
Norway
Molde
Fredrikstad
GG
NG
49%
(2.09)
GG
51%
(1.67)
England
Preston
Middlesbrough
GG
NG
49%
(1.88)
GG
51%
(1.83)
Slovenia
NK Maribor
NS Mura
GG
NG
49%
(1.91)
GG
51%
(1.75)
Slovakia
AS Trencin
MFK Ruzomberok
GG
NG
49%
(2.31)
GG
51%
(1.54)
Sweden
Degerfors
Mjallby
GG
NG
49%
(1.95)
GG
51%
(1.77)
Japan
Yokohama F. Marinos
Kawasaki Frontale
GG
NG
49%
(2.39)
GG
51%
(1.52)
Turkey
Konyaspor
Alanyaspor
GG
NG
49%
(1.92)
GG
51%
(1.78)
England
Newcastle
Wolverhampton
GG
NG
49%
(1.8)
GG
51%
(1.93)
Poland
Wisla Krakow
Odra Opole
GG
NG
49%
(1.75)
GG
51%
(1.95)
Russia
Dinamo Moskva
Spartak Moskva
GG
NG
49%
(2.22)
GG
51%
(1.63)
England
Oldham
Bromley
GG
NG
49%
(1.95)
GG
51%
(1.77)
Netherlands
Go Ahead Eagles
FC Volendam
GG
NG
49%
(2.4)
GG
51%
(1.52)
Mexico
Leones Negros UdeG
Atletico La Paz
GG
NG
49%
(2.18)
GG
51%
(1.6)
England
Bradford
Huddersfield
GG
NG
49%
(1.96)
GG
51%
(1.76)
England
Crawley
Cheltenham
GG
NG
49%
(2.05)
GG
51%
(1.7)
Wales
Barry Town United
Bala Town
GG
NG
49%
(2.15)
GG
51%
(1.62)
Peru
Sport Boys
Comerciantes Unidos
GG
NG
49%
(1.68)
GG
51%
(2.07)
Poland
Wisla Plock
Cracovia Krakow
GG
NG
49%
(1.94)
GG
51%
(1.78)


BTTS Betting Guide

Over the years I’ve come to appreciate how BTTS focuses on the excitement of goals without worrying about the final winner. BTTS stands out because it’s a simple market where you’re betting on whether both sides in a football match will score at least one goal each. To be honest coming up with tomorrow’s football BTTS predictions is usually the easiest.

I prefer BTTS because it’s less about picking a winner and more about predicting attacking flow, which can feel more reliable in football where underdogs often sneak a goal. From my experience, BTTS markets are popular in major leagues because they add layers to games that might otherwise seem one-sided.

Tomorrow's Football BTTS Predictions

Best Leagues and Match Types for BTTS Bets

Not every league or match is created equal for BTTS. Some are goal fests, others are snoozefests. Drawing from years of following global football, I’ll share where I’ve found the most success.

High-scoring leagues are your friends for BTTS Yes. The German Bundesliga tops the list with teams like Bayern and Dortmund play fast, attacking football, with averages often over 3 goals per game. I’ve cashed in on matches there where both sides score 70% of the time. The Dutch Eredivisie is similar, full of young, offensive talent and fewer defensive masterclasses. England’s Championship (second tier) is another hotspot, with unpredictable games and teams pushing for promotion.

For BTTS No, lean toward leagues with stout defenses. Italy’s Serie A can be cagey, especially in games involving teams like Inter or Napoli, where one side often keeps a clean sheet. France’s Ligue 1 sometimes fits, with PSG dominating but others focusing on survival through defense. Spain’s La Liga has its share of low-scorers too, like matches with Real Madrid against compact opponents.

Match types matter. Derbies are prime for BTTS Yes; think Manchester United vs. Manchester City or El Clasico. The rivalry amps up the intensity, leading to goals. End-of-season games can go either way: teams with nothing to play for might open up, while those in title or relegation battles get tense and defensive.

Midweek fixtures, like Champions League ties, often see BTTS due to fatigue and squad rotation. International breaks can disrupt form, creating mismatches. From my experience, avoid betting BTTS on early-season games when teams are still gelling. Wait for patterns to emerge. Target leagues you know well; I’ve stuck to Europe mostly, but MLS in the US offers fun, high-scoring options too.

Factors that Influence BTTS Outcomes

Football isn’t random; certain elements tip the scales. Understanding these can sharpen your edge.

First, attacking strength versus defensive weakness. If both teams have potent forwards but shaky backlines, BTTS Yes is often a lock. Take a team with a high goals-per-game average (say, over 1.5 scored) facing one that concedes plenty (over 1.5 per game). That’s a recipe for mutual scoring. In contrast, if one team dominates possession and shuts down attacks, like a prime Juventus in Serie A, BTTS No becomes appealing.

Player availability is huge. Injuries or suspensions to star attackers can kill a team’s scoring threat. Imagine betting BTTS Yes on a game where a side’s leading scorer is out. Goalkeepers matter too; a backup keeper prone to errors might let in soft goals, flipping a low-scoring matchup. I’ve adjusted bets last-minute based on team news, like when a key defender’s absence opened the floodgates.

Weather plays a role, especially in outdoor leagues. Heavy rain or wind can make games scrappy, reducing clear chances and favoring BTTS No. Hot, dry conditions might lead to more open play and goals. Motivation levels count as well especially teams fighting relegation often push hard for goals, while those safe in mid-table might settle for draws. Cup games, with their knockout stakes, can produce desperate attacks from trailing sides, boosting BTTS chances.

Tactics and styles are key. Managers who favor high pressing (like Jurgen Klopp’s teams) create turnovers and goals, while those who sit deep (think Jose Mourinho specials) stifle them. Look at recent games: if a team switches to a more offensive formation, that could signal BTTS potential.

From my bets, I’ve seen how these factors combine. In a Bundesliga clash between Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund, strong attacks on both sides, plus a history of high scores, scream BTTS Yes. But in a tight La Liga game between Atletico Madrid and a mid-table team, Diego Simeone’s defensive setup often leads to BTTS No. Weigh these elements together, and you’ll predict outcomes with more confidence.